|
On 25 June 2008, the European Parliament's Standing Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs asked for measures to correct the European Commission's proposal to amend the Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications (called ePrivacy Directive).
"We have introduced a few points directed towards better consumer
protection and manageability" in order to "improve data protection
overall and bring it in line with the changed situation" stated
Rapporteur for the project MEP Alexander Alvaro (FDP).
Peter
Hustinx, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), adopted, on 14
April, an Opinion on the European Commission's proposal amending, among
others, the ePrivacy Directive. The EDPS basically supported the EC
proposal giving a few recommendations such as the obligation to notify
any breach of security not only from providers of public electronic
communication services in public networks but also from providers of
information society services which process sensitive personal data.
What
the MEPs are now asking for is a procedure to inform users, in case of
security breaches at service providers and a better protection from
surveillance. For the measures requiring providers of electronic
services to inform users of breaches of data protection, the MEPs
intend to involve an intermediary body. The companies will inform
national telecommunications regulators or other "competent authorities"
on "serious" security breaches of personal data and the regulatory
bodies will decide if consumers need to be rapidly informed. The
companies might also be asked to report the occurrence of security
problems in their annual reports.
One of the aspects that was
largely debated within the Committee was related to the collection of
personal data such as IP addresses, a compromise being reached in the
end considering that an online identity should be specifically
considered as an item of personal information needing special
protection when it is related to an individual in combination with
other information. The EP Committee asked the European Commission to
submit, in consultation with EU data protection officials, within the
next two years, specific draft legislation for treating IP addresses as
personal data.
Alvaro's proposal to apply the provision
allowing member states to enact their own legislation to relax
protection of connection and location data for public security and the
prevention, detection and prosecution of criminal acts or illegal use
of electronic communications systems, to cases when ownership rights
are infringed, failed as concerns have been expressed by data
protection officials, such as German data protection commissioner Peter
Schaar.
However, Alvaro succeeded in passing several other
proposals such as the future application of the directive to publicly
accessible private telecommunications networks including university
networks or social networks such as StudiVZ or Facebook. Companies
offering applications attempting to access personal data on hard
drives, or other IT systems, such as USB flash drives, will have to get
the user's consent beforehand on the basis of the opt-in principle.
Alvaro drew the attention that a user setting his browser to accept
cookies would be considered to give consent to data collection.
However, according to the directive, in the future, cookies for storing
user data using the Flash multimedia application will require separate
consent.
According to Alvaro, the amendments proposed by the
Standing Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs will be
incorporated into the report of the Internal Market and Consumer
Protection committee, primarily responsible for the telecommunications
package. The entire package for regulating telecommunications companies
and ISPs will be voted in September after a first reading at a plenary
session. The European Council will be then required to submit comments.
During
its 66th plenary session that took place in Brussels between 24-25
June, the Article 29 Working Party expressed its opinion on the review
of the E-privacy Directive fully supporting "the proposed strengthening
of Article 4 'Security' by requiring providers of publicly available
communication services to notify security breaches, and underlines the
importance of informing all persons concerned when their personal data
have been compromised or are at risk of being compromised."
However,
the Working Party 29 considers there are issues that still need to be
covered such as the need to extend the scope of the obligation to
notify security breaches to the providers of information society
services as well as the scope of the recipients of the notification to
include all persons concerned rather than only the "subscribers".
MEPs adopt draft "e-privacy directive" reforms (27.06.2008)
Press Release - Article 29 Working Party (26.06.2008)
Working
Party Article 29, Opinion on the review of the Directive 2002/58/EC on
privacy and electronic communications (ePrivacy Directive) (15.05.2008)
EDRIgram - EDPS endorses data breach notification provision in ePrivacy Directive (23.04.2008)
Source: EDRI-gram „ePrivacy Directive debated in the EP's Civil Liberties Committee“ Number 6.13, 2 July 2008
(1830 hits/посети) |